Originally posted by Jay
I think the problem is not religon itselt, but the extremes.
I dont think any 'normal' muslim would agree the attacks on the world trade centre are justified or the correct action to take. It was an extremist group.
I think it is the same in Northern Ireland. There are a few people on the edge of the situation who cause the trouble where as the majority just want to get on with their normal lives.
While I am not religous in the slightest I wouldnt want to see everybody persecuted for the few that cause problems. Do we stop everyone driving cars simply because some people drive incorrectly/irresponsible nope. Each to their own as long as its not causing pain or suffering to others.
I agree with your sentiment Jay, but I don't think you quite see what I am saying..
We have a social framework in place, where we promote religion, through our schools, in our media, etc etc.
A great many people in the UK describe themselves as Christian on forms, but will say they are agnostic, don't go to chruch, and don't follow any religious belief, apart from maybe "praying" for six numbers, and "being good to others"
However, this massive percentage of the population continues to call itself "christian", which gives the christian churches a level of influence in parliament, far beyond what their true numbers would support. (church of england in particular has a lot of influence)
What I am getting at is the extremists get listened to, because the silent majority give their approval by saying nothing!
I find nothing more horrific than the thought of an ever increasing number of represenatives from religions in the house of lords, when surveys carried out in the UK suggest that fewer than 40% of people believe in *ANY* god at all, and less than 11% regularly attend any type of church service.
Religious Adherants, who piously follow their faith are outnumbered in the UK by Hardcore Star Trek fans.
They do not deserve or require special representation in our country's parliament.