Ww3?

  • Hey - turns out IRC is out and something a little more modern has taken it's place... A little thing called Discord!

    Join our community @ https://discord.gg/JuaSzXBZrk for a pick-up game, or just to rekindle with fellow community members.

.:SupaFLY:.

I can FLY....
Aug 12, 2001
912
0
Norway
USA is gonne retailiete and blow the terrorist to hell!! ALL this could leave to WW3!!!!!! There will be nuclear bombs flying over our heads.....

NATO is "in", joing USA to retaliate!!! .......some off the terrorist have nuclear bombs, not good. Bush sad that he will retailiate....

Its chaos......i just cheacked the news, inicent people dies. Some palestiner was beaten up at schools!

I REALLY hope its not gonne be WW3!!!
 
You stupid?
There is like a agreement with the western world to NEVER use nuclair weapons anymore, they just have different weapons now something like Gas Bombs that will kill every living thing in the land, but won't harm any buildings etc!
good for infrastucture like they say who made it... idiots

btw that's also why Bush wants that rocket shield, he might not be as dumb as most people think.
bush already has the whole fleet standby to shoot anything out of the air that goes to USA!...


arg~!
















Maybe I just watch to most discovery fs I gotta quiet watching all that info shit, messes up your mind, but WTF anyway.
just hope they take out the right guy before killing innocent!
 
IF their was WW3 would young children get sent to remote places of the country, such as farmin areas etc...
Cause dont wanna be mean but i aint havin no screamin brat runnijn round with sticky fingers makin a mess of all the things i just cleaned:mad: :D
 
Chill out there mate - how exactly do you have a war against a terroist group - if thats the responsible party. You can't. its like saying "They're going to "nuke" Ireland/ Northern Ireland as the IRA reside there."

Can't just go blowing up countries because people hide there. Get a grip.
 
Uh... well..

There is a different point of views here.. Bombing a country in order to get even with terrorists; in a smaller scale, that has happened before; US retaliated last binladen-acts with cruise missiles against the nations involved, not to bin laden himself.

Israeli defended itself againts Lebanon with a large-scale air raid a few years ago, striking the nations infrastructure in such condinition that no threat will evolve. And hasn't since.

The western countries have agreed not to use nuclear weapon FIRST.

But, hopefully, only the terrorists are the only party in this shit who whish that the whole world will burn in nuclear fire.

I don't think that this will therefore lead to total disaster.

If it is not that allready.

Sad time for poor planet earth this is anyway.
 
.......me saying WW3 was a bit mutch, dont think it whould be like that.......But we cant provent a war!!

Two words: artical 5
 
Don't make no MISTAKES we will find the man who did this and punish them!

says the most powerfull man in the world. well you take his position and your country men that you serve get killed what would you do? ( bush was having tears and was very pissed, who wouldn't yes? )
so a small war is coming for like 90% sure, depends how the Arabic country's react and who did it. bin laden with help from Sadam then Desert storm2.
Just Bin laden then he get's deliverd by the arabic county's to USA(WHAT IS REAL GOOD OF THEM they don't want a war!)
otherwise like you says americans: already said that they suspect who had flying lesson were arabic, so leave this option out.

just WORLD war 3 isn't coming, even Russia says that USA has to take revenge like they say in there kind words.

just my opinion off course and I am drunk so don't mind me! :P
 
Im so fucking tired of ppl commenting on things they obveously dont have a clue about.Good thbing im not a moderator in this forum, or the those posts would start disapering fast..
 
like hell am i a cleaner:mad:
I just h8 livin in a dirty flat and i clean my computer twice a week:D
 
Some Sun reporter once rang up Cynthia Paynes bothel and said "can I have some domination?" and the hooker on the other end said "Can I have some domination PLEASE?"

Made me chuckle:D
 
GEN u really are 1 sick basterd! why are u trying to be funny on these threads?? And scream around that u r fucking tired of ppl commenting on things they obveously dont have a clue about??? Jesus maby some do have a clue! And try to share these with others! So they can learn some thing from it.....


I really hope that '76 doesnt mean your 25 yo, cause it seems your brain stopped growing when u were 10!
 
I recieved this mail, maybe some of ya should actually take the time to read it...

| > > > Dear Friends,
| > > > The following was sent to me by my friend Tamim Ansary. Tamim is
| > >an Afghani-American writer. He is also one of the most brilliant people
| > >I know in this life. When he writes, I read. When he talks, I listen.
| > >Here is his take on Afghanistan and the whole mess we are in.
| > > > -Gary T.
| > > >
| > > >
| > > > Dear Gary and whoever else is on this email thread:
| > > >
| > > > I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back to
| > >the Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO Talk Radio today, allowed that this
| > >would mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with
| > >this atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral damage.
| > >What else can we do?" Minutes later I heard some TV pundit discussing
| > >whether we "have the belly to do what must be done."
| > > And I thought about the issues being raised especially hard because
| > >I am from Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've
| > >never lost track of what's going on there. So I want to tell anyone who
| > >will listen how it all looks from where I'm standing.
| > >I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. There is no
| > >doubt in my mind that these people were responsible for the atrocity
| > >in New York. I agree that something must be done about those monsters.
| > >But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not even
| > >the government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of ignorant
| > >psychotics
| > >who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political criminal
| > >with a plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think Bin
| > >Laden, think Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan" think
| > >"the Jews in the concentration camps." It's not only that the Afghan
| > >people had nothing to do with this atrocity.
| > >They were the first victims of the perpetrators. They would exult if
| > >someone would come in there, take out the Taliban and clear out the rats
| > >nest of international thugs holed up in their country.
| > > Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban? The
| > >answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering.
| > >A few years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are 500,000
| > >disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country with no economy, no food.
| > > > There are millions of widows. And the Taliban has been burying these
| > >widows alive in mass graves. The soil is littered with land mines, the
| > >farms were all destroyed by the Soviets. These are a few of the reasons
| > >why the Afghan people have not overthrown the Taliban.
| > > >We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone
| > >Age. Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets took care of it already.
| > >Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their houses?
| > >Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done. Eradicate their
| > >hospitals? Done. Destroy their infrastructure? Cut them off from
| >medicine
| > >and health care? Too late. Someone already did all that.
| > > >
| > > New bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs. Would they at
| > >least get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan, only the
| >Taliban
| > >eat, only they have the means to move around. They'd slip away and hide.
| > >Maybe the bombs would get some of those disabled orphans, they don't
| > >move too fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But flying over Kabul
| > >and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a strike against the criminals
| > >who did this horrific thing. Actually it would only be making common
| > >cause with the Taliban--by raping once again the people they've been
| > >raping all this time
| > > > So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now speak with
| > >true fear and trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go in there
| > >with ground troops. When people speak of "having the belly to do what
| > >needs to be done" they're thinking in terms of having the belly to kill
| > >as many as needed. Having the belly to overcome any moral qualms about
| > >killing innocent people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand. What's
| > >actually on the table is Americans dying. And not just because some
| > >Americans
| > >would die fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout.
| > > It's much bigger than that folks. Because to get any troops to
| > >Afghanistan,
| > >we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would they
| > >let us? Not likely. The conquest of Pakistan would have to be first.
| > >Will other Muslim nations just stand by? You see where I'm going. We're
| > >flirting with a world war between Islam and the West.
| > > And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he
| >wants.
| > >That's why he did this. Read his speeches and statements. It's all right
| > >there. He really believes Islam would beat the west. It might seem
| > >ridiculous,
| > >but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam and the West,
| > >he's got a billion soldiers. If the west wreaks a holocaust in those
| > >lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to lose, that's even
| > >better from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably wrong, in the end
| > >the west would win, whatever that would mean, but the war would last
| > >for years and millions would die, not just theirs but ours. Who has the
| > >belly for that? Bin Laden does. Anyone else?
| > >
| > > > Tamim Ansary
 
This guy prolly lives in the North and has nothing to fear, cos the taliban are in the south.
 
Nice point of view of that email:
the western world just doesn't look further, call it propagenda..
we only see USA did we ever look at afghanistan and their trouble NO and why because tbh we just don't give a shit and don't you tell me you give a shit, because that's bollox it may seems harsh but it's just like that..

we can't feel anything were we don't even know about, like the thousand children who make footballs so we can play soccer!

I got the belly for it, because when you do nothing and ignore it to don't risk a 3th world war you will get more terror and bommings because they can just do it without any trouble!

weird huh my opinion I know it sucks, but wtf right tell me I am wrong plz