The Hobbit
- Thread starter html
- Start date
-
Hey - turns out IRC is out and something a little more modern has taken it's place... A little thing called Discord!
Join our community @ https://discord.gg/JuaSzXBZrk for a pick-up game, or just to rekindle with fellow community members.
What I think is most interesting about this movie is that they shoot it in 48 fps and have i think a premiere with that. Since the 20s all movies are shot in 24 fps so it'll get a very "real" feel, like watching a soap series. It's quite a risk if people will accept it but I'm looking forward to it.
well it makes sense, bilbo meets legolas's father Thranduil lord of mirkwood so obviously Legolas was alive and about in the time of bilbo, he's just not mentionned in the book
also Gloin Gimli's father is one of the 13 dwarves of the expedition but Gimli was alive and well during the time of the hobbit as well, so he may even make a cameo !! (if the actor agrees)
if they try to show frodo pippin merry sam or boromir that would be a mistake as none of them were born, and just from memory i think aragorn was 21 years old at the time of the hobbit and in rivendell so there again possible cameo if the actor agrees
also Gloin Gimli's father is one of the 13 dwarves of the expedition but Gimli was alive and well during the time of the hobbit as well, so he may even make a cameo !! (if the actor agrees)
if they try to show frodo pippin merry sam or boromir that would be a mistake as none of them were born, and just from memory i think aragorn was 21 years old at the time of the hobbit and in rivendell so there again possible cameo if the actor agrees
God I hope they are released in 2D with no loss of quality or run time. 3D is a total waste of time, adds nothing to the viewing experience and makes the whole thing darker... Rubbish.
I watched POTC 4 the other day in 3D (2D was fully booked) and took my glasses off for most of the film coz it was so dark! didnt make the film any better though.
I watched POTC 4 the other day in 3D (2D was fully booked) and took my glasses off for most of the film coz it was so dark! didnt make the film any better though.
Gazzz!shitty 3d is shitty
I saw jackass 3-d.... in 3d and it was indeed a shit/worthless effect
good 3d on the other hand can be nice and immersive, just think of Avatar.
I think it's safe to say that Peter Jackson's use of 3d will equal or surpass that of James Cameron's
I saw jackass 3-d.... in 3d and it was indeed a shit/worthless effect
good 3d on the other hand can be nice and immersive, just think of Avatar.
I think it's safe to say that Peter Jackson's use of 3d will equal or surpass that of James Cameron's
The only convincing 3D was like HTML just mentioned Avatar, but still it isn't the thing I'm looking for in movies.
Also read why! => http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/01/post_4.html
the darkness of the 3d movie really depends on which 3d the cinema use. If they have an old white screen (dunno the exact details, im not a professor) then they use different kind of glasses which make it dark yes.. But newer cinemas (including the one i go to) have something different (silver screens or something?) and the colors seem as bright as when you watch it without glasses.
not sure on the details, but it really differs
not sure on the details, but it really differs
