@Gazz:
I seem to have hit a nerve?
I have already stated that I don't blame the referee for anything, I realize their job is tough enough as it is.
In my first post I noted that if there was 1 thing he didn't do, it was letting the game flow. Off course he has to stop play for (bad) fouls. If you think that is what I mean by not letting the game flow I question your intelligence, or lack of it. But he seemingly stopped play for every small contact, and how many times could he have played advantage but didn't? I can remember at least on 5 occasions. To me, that is holding up the play unneccesary, which frustrates both sides and everyone watching.
I am biased in the sense of me supporting NL, but I'm interested to find out which statements in particular I have made which have prompted you to not take my comments seriously? Should I disregard all your comments concerning Mr Webb since you are English?
In fact, all I have said about the ref was that I think he didn't let the game flow as much as he could, and that he's made really bad decisions on both sides, which lead me to the conclusion that he's had a bad game. Of course he's tried his best, that's the least anyone can do tbh, doesn't mean he can't have a bad game.
I am completely flabbergasted as to why you come up with these examples of how NL got lucky, or how Spain could've had a red card as well. I merely stated that the man made bad decisions on both sides, do u think I didn't incluse all those moments in that statement? And don't you indirectly agree with me that Webb was poor on the night considering all these moments you mentioned?
And where have I said or given u the impression that 'I felt agrieved at some of the decisions made by the ref'?
I merely countered ur previous posting because I disliked like the way u addressed previous posters, including myself, using words such as 'hilariously biased' and 'crazy comments'. Much like how u questioned my sanity in ur last posting, for which you have already received my stab-back in this posting.
I seem to have hit a nerve?
I have already stated that I don't blame the referee for anything, I realize their job is tough enough as it is.
In my first post I noted that if there was 1 thing he didn't do, it was letting the game flow. Off course he has to stop play for (bad) fouls. If you think that is what I mean by not letting the game flow I question your intelligence, or lack of it. But he seemingly stopped play for every small contact, and how many times could he have played advantage but didn't? I can remember at least on 5 occasions. To me, that is holding up the play unneccesary, which frustrates both sides and everyone watching.
I am biased in the sense of me supporting NL, but I'm interested to find out which statements in particular I have made which have prompted you to not take my comments seriously? Should I disregard all your comments concerning Mr Webb since you are English?
In fact, all I have said about the ref was that I think he didn't let the game flow as much as he could, and that he's made really bad decisions on both sides, which lead me to the conclusion that he's had a bad game. Of course he's tried his best, that's the least anyone can do tbh, doesn't mean he can't have a bad game.
I am completely flabbergasted as to why you come up with these examples of how NL got lucky, or how Spain could've had a red card as well. I merely stated that the man made bad decisions on both sides, do u think I didn't incluse all those moments in that statement? And don't you indirectly agree with me that Webb was poor on the night considering all these moments you mentioned?
And where have I said or given u the impression that 'I felt agrieved at some of the decisions made by the ref'?
I merely countered ur previous posting because I disliked like the way u addressed previous posters, including myself, using words such as 'hilariously biased' and 'crazy comments'. Much like how u questioned my sanity in ur last posting, for which you have already received my stab-back in this posting.
Regardless, you have clearly shown that you fail at reading!Regardless, you have clearly made your mind up and can believe what you wish!